At the end of the decade of 1990, David Peker reached American Media Inc., Jerry George got himself firmly in the pond empire.
In 1985, the late publisher of the National Enquirer was rented by Jenesso Pope Jr., George went for 28 years to work in Enquire and its parent company AMI, before leaving the company, senior editor and West Coast Bureau Chief Earned the title of 2013
When Pecker was named the AMI Chairman and Chief Executive, the Enquire has changed dramatically. A well-researched resource in George's stories, the hoarse lobro became the gossip rag, an additional operation that sometimes worked as a safety racket for some celebrities - especially Donald Trump, "close personal friend of Peker ". In return for information related to the payment made to porn star Toufani Daniels and former playboy model Karen McDougall, who was granted immunity by Federal to Pekar this week, the prosecution
In the Cohen case, the Prosecutors claimed that Cohen and Pecker attacked an agreement for "dealing with negative stories" about Trump two months after the announcement of his candidature for the President. But George said that AMI had already become the "official organ" of Trump.
George talked about Pecker with HuffPost this week, the role played in the development of Enquirer and the image of the Trumpet (AMI did not respond to comments and requests by phone.)
Below is a copy of the interview, edit and condensate.
*****
In the case of Michael Cohen, the prosecution claimed this week that there was a coordinated campaign between AMI and Cohen from the beginning of Trump's campaign to catch and kill negative stories about Trump. Have you been surprised?
Well, it is clear that Trump Presidency is breaking down, and I think the American media was its pillar and certainly complicated in any fusion. Thanks to AMI for bothering anything negative about them, he got the President Wood and traction to become a more attractive candidate.
But the degree of coordination between the company and the Presidential candidate for clearly catching and killing stories: What did you know about the company present there? Or does it look like a more extreme version of what you saw?
It progressed badly during the years. David Peker and the American media were encouraged to help in any way. I think his last concern was his readership. This was another front to generate cash to continue building its empire.
When the story of the first Karen McDougall broke in October 2016, AMI told the Wall Street Journal that he had never paid to kill harmful stories about Trump, and now it seems that it is not so. Do you have any idea why they will say something like that?
I think that this is just basic corruption. David Pecker's last interest is to report facts. He is not traditionally a journalist. She is a businessman. This is a company which is motivated by greed, is not a public interest and does not maintain the value of the fourth asset.
Did you know that when you were there?
This was becoming more and more clear as David Peker. Now keep in mind, I have gone for almost five years, but the moment she handled it, it was made clear that Trump was her closest friend and we would be the official organ for Donald Trump.
Then back all the way?
Oh yeah, whenever Pecker captured, at the end of the 90s, suddenly we stopped reporting negative stories on Donald Trump, and there were so many! In the olden days, Trump was a good copy. Their foibles, their divorce, their romance, their sexual escape - and then all stopped.
How did that happen? Was it clearly stated? Was it told to those top people who pushed that message down?
It became clear. We will cover the trump aggressively through the '90s, which brings us to the end of the marriage - who is beauty which was a beauty queen?
Marla Maple?
Killed maple. We followed that story like monsters. It was a great story! And they finally got married, and then David Peker came in and suddenly any negative stories on the Donald Trump [have been canceled]. Story leads were submitted and quickly declined. It became clear that he was wearing the editors. It was not verbally at my level, but it was clear that his mission was to clean the image of Donald Trump because he had political ambitions.
Did pecker do Or trump?
Trump I think David Pecker praised Donald Trump's sidekick for himself. They were a kind of brother. None of them have ever been accepted by humble society. There was a lot in his way. They were social nuisances, which only remembered the mark till the society, and the coalition was formed.
But did Pecker not say anything about this? Was it something that could be understood by the staff?
If Trump's subject came, socially, in a lunch or staff meeting, it was clear that he was not interested in aggressively pursuing Trump as a famous person. In the following pages it became clear that he only wanted to snooze Puff on his friend Donald Trump.
Was there any other friend of Pecker who reached the level of Donald Trump?
No, no one reached that level. She came as the first friend of the American media. He was very close to David. On the go, every story was cleaned on the Donald Trump. Until that point, Donald Trump was a very big copy. And everyone knows how much he loved [Trump] with the publicity. He will call the journalists. The whole thing about drama was his own publicist and that kind of thing. [Before Peker], when we did unfamiliar stories, she could come back and we will do something good about her. Once Pekar came into management, he did not take it seriously.
What were the things like David Pecker arrived at AMI?
Advertising related options
Prior to Pekar's arrival, the philosophy was always like: to cover the sensational stories at the level of aggressively around the world. We were well-funded, had a huge editorial budget and we followed all of our interest interest to our readers.
How did things begin to change after pecking once?
The budget was reduced. Employees cut off Generally, it was trying to distribute the same product, but trying to distribute the same product.
This was becoming more and more clear as David Peker. Now keep in mind, I've gone for almost five years, but the moment she handled it, it became clear that Trump was her closest friend and we would be the official body for Donald Trump.
Then back all the way?
Oh yes, whenever Pecker captured at the end of the 90s, suddenly we stopped reporting negative stories on Donald Trump, and there were so many! In the olden days, Trump was a good copy. Their foibles, their divorce, their romance, their sexual escape - and then all stopped.
how did this happen? Was it clearly stated? Was it told to those top people who pushed the message?
it became clear. We will cover the trump aggressively through the '90s, which brings us to the end of the marriage - which beauty queen was beauty?
Killed maple?
The killed maple we followed the story like the demons. It was a great story! And finally, they were married, and then David Peker came in and suddenly any negative stories on the Donald Trump [have been canceled]. Story leads were submitted and quickly declined. It became clear that he was wearing the editor. It was not verbally at my level, but it was clear that his mission was to clean the image of Donald Trump because he had political ambitions.
What do pecker do or trumpet?
Trump I think David Peker praised Donald Trump's sidekick. They were a kind of brother. None of them have ever been accepted by the humble society. There was a lot in his way. They were social nuisances, which were remembered only by the society, and the alliance was formed.
But did Pecker say nothing about this? Was it something that could be understood by the employees?
If Trump's subject came in a socially, lunch-or-staff meeting, it was clear that he was not interested in aggressively pursuing Trump as a famous person. It became clear in the following pages that he wanted to snooze Puff only on his friend Donald Trump.
Was there any other friend of Pecker who reached the level of Donald Trump?
No, no one reached that level. She came as the first friend of the American media. He was very close to David. While walking, every story was cleared on the Donald Trump. To that point, Donald Trump was a very big copy. And everyone knows how much he loved [Trump] with the promotion. He will call the journalists. The whole thing about the drama was his own publicist and that kind of thing. [Before Peker], when we did unfamiliar stories, she could come back and we would do something good about her. Once Pecker came into management, he did not take it seriously.
Things like David Peker reach AMI?
Ad related options
Prior to the arrival of Pecker, the philosophy was always like: to cover sensational stories at aggressive levels all over the world. We were well-funded, had a huge editorial budget and we followed all our interest interest for our readers.
How did things begin to change after pecking once?
The budget was reduced. Generally employees are cut off, this was trying to distribute the same product, but was trying to distribute the same product.
This was becoming more and more clear as David Peker. Now keep in mind, I've gone for almost five years, but the moment she handled it, it became clear that Trump was her closest friend and we would be the official body for Donald Trump.
Then back all the way?
Oh yeah, whenever Pecker captured at the end of the 90s, suddenly we stopped reporting negative stories on Donald Trump, and there were so many! In the olden days, Trump was a good copy. Their foibles, their divorce, their romance, their sexual escape - and then all stopped.
How did this happen? Was it clearly stated? Was it told to those top people who pushed the message?
it became clear. We will cover the trump aggressively through the '90s, which brings us to the end of the wedding - which beauty was the beauty of the queen?
Killed maple?
The killed maple we followed the story like the monsters. It was a great story! And finally, they were married, and then David Peker came in and suddenly any negative stories on the Donald Trump [have been canceled]. Story leads were submitted and quickly declined. It became clear that he was wearing the editor. It was not verbally at my level, but it was clear that his mission was to clean the image of Donald Trump because he had political ambitions.
What do pecker do or trumpet?
Trump I think David Peker praised Donald Trump's sidekick. They were a kind of brother. None of them have ever been accepted by the humble society. There was a lot in his way. They were social nuisances, which were only remembered by the society, and the coalition was formed.
But did Pecker say nothing about this? Was it something that could be understood by the employees?
If Trump's subject came in a socially, lunch-or-staff meeting, it was clear that he was not interested in aggressively pursuing Trump as a famous person. It became clear in the following pages that he wanted to snooze Puff only on his friend Donald Trump.
Was there any other friend of Pecker who reached the level of Donald Trump?
No, no one reached that level. She came as the first friend of the American media. He was very close to David. While walking, every story was approved on Donald Trump. At that point, Donald Trump was a very big copy. And everyone knows how much he loved [trump] with the promotion. He will call the journalists. The whole thing about the drama was his own publicist and that kind of thing. [Before Peker], when we did unfamiliar stories, she could come back and we would do something good about her. Once Pecker came into management, he did not take it seriously.
Things like David Peker reach AMI?
Ad related options
Prior to the arrival of Pecker, the philosophy was always like: to cover sensational stories at the offensive level all over the world. We were well-funded, had a huge editorial budget and we followed all our interest interest for our readers.
How did things begin to change after pecking once?
The budget was reduced. Generally employees are cut off, this was trying to distribute the same product, but trying to distribute the same product.
Do you think the amount of publicity received by Pekar and AMI will convince them to stop these strategies? Or do you think it is at this point?
I think the American media is clearly squirming. They are now in the hot seat and everyone has them. Did you see the publication of McDougall which was shown in the Journal of Men? I would love to see the numbers on that sale. They are still hesitant, though hesitate, but now everyone has them. it's all happening.
I think you do not have any idea about Mr. Dillon Howard.
I knew Dillon. I thought that Dylan was a gentleman. My behavior with him was always fine. I have no ax to grind, but it is clear that when he got a traction with the company, he embraced the company line, which kept Donald Trump above all others.
You may be surprised to know this but it has come now that Pecker has been given immunity in the Michael Cohen case and he is going to speak freely about what Donald Trump knows about, and I believe that Dylan Howard is also there. Does he amaze you?
Actually, I'm not surprised.
Comments
Post a Comment